United States of America v. Alvin Bernard Truesdale

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7329
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ALVIN BERNARD TRUESDALE,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 10-7479
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ALVIN BERNARD TRUESDALE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (3:92-cr-00034-MR-1)
Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 8, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alvin Bernard Truesdale, Appellant Pro Se. Frank D. Whitney,
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth
Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Alvin Bernard Truesdale appeals from the district
court’s orders (1) denying his motions for leave to file a
response to counsel’s statement of his noneligibility for a
sentence reduction, for a copy of his presentence report, to
appoint new counsel based on a conflict of interest, and for
judicial notice, and (2) granting his attorney’s motion to
withdraw as counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Truesdale’s motion for
appointment of counsel, and we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Truesdale, No. 3:92-cr-
00034-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 7 & 27, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --