The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7313•United States of America v. Jason Landis Linder, a/k/a Black, a/k/a Rodney Peterson
10-7313Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 6, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7313
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JASON LANDIS LINDER, a/k/a Black, a/k/a Rodney Peterson,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-5)
Submitted: March 30, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jason Landis Linder, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jason Landis Linder appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to compel the Government to move for a
reduction in his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See United States v. Linder, No.
2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-5 (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.