The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7249•Derrick Young v. CHAD WADDELL, Sergeant
10-7249Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 19, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7249
DERRICK YOUNG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHAD WADDELL, Sergeant; BOBBY HARLESS, Superintendent; KENNETH
JONES, Inmate Grievance Examiner; JONNITA WILLIAMS, Inmate
Grievance Examiner; FNU CREWS, Officer; INA HINTON,
Administrative Assistant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (5:10-cv-00101-GCM)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 19, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Young, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derrick Young appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without
prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and
denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. Waddell, No.
5:10-cv-00101-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2010 & Nov. 8, 2010). We
deny Young’s motion for appointment of counsel and his motion to
stay the appeal in order to allow him to submit additional
documentation. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.