The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7225•MALCOLM WRIGHT, JR., a/k/a Malcolm Y. Azariah v. BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons
10-7225Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 9, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7225
MALCOLM WRIGHT, JR., a/k/a Malcolm Y. Azariah,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons; BETTY BROWN, Head
Chaplain Services; BETTY POPE, Head Dietician Other Paula
Pope; MR. BRANKER, Warden; JACKIE PARKER, Chief of Food and
Nutrition Services,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:08-ct-03129-BO)
Submitted: December 2, 2010 Decided: March 9, 2011
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcolm Wright, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Oliver Gray Wheeler,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Wright, Jr., appeals a district court order
granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his
complaint brought under the Religious Land Use and
Institutionalized Persons Act, Pub. L. No. 106-274, 114 Stat.
804, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1(a) (2006) (“RLUIPA”). He also appeals
the order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm
for the reasons cited by the district court. See Wright v.
Bennett, No. 5:08-ct-03129-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 2010; Aug. 25,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.