The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7224•United States of America v. Lacarlos Demond Cureton, a/k/a Loco
10-7224Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 26, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7224
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LACARLOS DEMOND CURETON, a/k/a Loco,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (0:02-cr-01173-JFA-7)
Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 26, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lacarlos Demond Cureton, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lacarlos Demond Cureton appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed.
R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Cureton, No.
0:02-cr-01173-JFA-7 (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.