The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7184•Anthony Mustafan Chisley v. JAMES HOLWAGER, Chief Psychologist
10-7184Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 22, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7184
ANTHONY MUSTAFAN CHISLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES HOLWAGER, Chief Psychologist; RICHARD J. GRAHAM, JR.,
Assistant Warden; SHERRY HAFERKAMP, Psychologist; BOOTH,
Psychologist; HARR, Social Worker, et al., individually and
in their own official capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:09-cv-02099-DKC)
Submitted: August 24, 2011 Decided: September 22, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Mustafan Chisley, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Mustafan Chisley appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.*
AFFIRMED
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Chisley v. Holwager, No. 8:09-cv-02099-DKC (D. Md.
July 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
* We previously remanded this case to the district court for
the limited purpose of enabling the court to determine whether
Chisley had shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an
extension of time to appeal. Chisley v. Holwager, 2011 WL
1320688 (4th Cir. Apr. 7, 2011) (No. 10-7184). On remand, the
district court granted his motion for extension of time to file
a notice of appeal. His appeal is therefore deemed timely
filed.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.