The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7161•United States of America v. Devon L. Alexander
10-7161Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 28, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7161
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DEVON L. ALEXANDER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (4:06-cr-00118-WDK-TEM-1)
Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 28, 2010
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Devon L. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Devon L. Alexander appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion to dismiss his indictment and motion to
reconsider. The district court also considered Alexander’s
motion as one for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Alexander, No. 4:06-cr-00118-WDK-TEM-1
(E.D. Va. June 23, 2010 & July 13, 2010). We deny Alexander’s
motion to compel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.