The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7156•United States of America v. Samuel Lewis Baker, Jr.
10-7156Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 21, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7156
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL LEWIS BAKER, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson,
District Judge. (5:04-cr-30073-sgw-1)
Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 21, 2011
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel Lewis Baker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Joseph W.H. Mott,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Lewis Baker, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his self-styled “Motion for Case Review and
Reconsideration,” which the district court construed as a motion
for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Baker, No.
5:04-cr-30073-sgw-1 (W.D. Va. Aug. 13, 2010). We deny Baker’s
motion for court records and dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.