The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7134•United States of America v. Charles Thomas Ross
10-7134Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 28, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7134
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
CHARLES THOMAS ROSS,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith,
District Judge. (2:06-cr-00056-RBS-FBS-1)
Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 28, 2010
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Thomas Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Westley Haynie,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Thomas Ross appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Ross, No. 2:06-cr-
00056-RBS-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. June 22, 2010); see United States v.
Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding district court
lacked authority to grant defendant’s motion to reconsider
seeking further reduction of his sentence). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.