United States of America v. Norman Tyrone Dais

10-7124Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 6, 2010

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7124
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NORMAN TYRONE DAIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Florence,
at District of South Carolina. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:03-cr-00386-TLW-1)
Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Norman Tyrone Dais, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard
Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Norman Tyrone Dais appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for production of documents for his
inspection. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm. Dais has not given any
substantial reason for granting the request. We also deny his
motion for an expedited appeal. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.