The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7095•United States of America v. James D. Mayer
10-7095Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 8, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7095
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES D. MAYER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:04-cr-00209-JRS-2)
Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 8, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James D. Mayer, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Mastandrea-Miller,
Assistant United States Attorney, Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James D. Mayer appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his
motion to compel the government to file a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b)
motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Mayer, No. 3:04-cr-00209-
JRS-2 (E.D. Va. July 16, 2010). We deny Mayer’s motions to
appoint counsel and motion for transcripts, and we grant the
motion to seal his informal brief. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.