The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7061•United States of America v. Steven Dixon Prentice
10-7061Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 2, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7061
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (1:01-cr-00031-JAB-1)
Submitted: January 28, 2011 Decided: March 2, 2011
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Dixon Prentice, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Brodish Binkley,
Assistant Attorney General, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Steven Dixon Prentice appeals the district court’s
order substituting the North Carolina Fund for Medical
Assistance (Medicaid) for the Orange County Department of Social
Services as the payee of restitution ordered in this case. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Prentice, No. 1:01-cr-00031-JAB-1
(M.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.