The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7034•United States of America v. Michael Alonza Rufus
10-7034Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 16, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7034
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (3:02-cr-00550-MJP-1)
Submitted: February 25, 2011 Decided: March 16, 2011
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Alonza Rufus, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth
Witherspoon, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Alonza Rufus appeals the district court’s
order denying his post-judgment motion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. See United States v. Rufus, No. 3:02-
cr-00550-MJP-1 (D.S.C. July 15, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.