The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7019•Adam Wade Owens v. DONNIE HARRISON, Sheriff
10-7019Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 8, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7019
ADAM WADE OWENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DONNIE HARRISON, Sheriff; P. WILLIAMS, Captain; D. MEREDITH,
Lieutenant; A. LUCAS, Sergeant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:08-ct-03100-FL)
Submitted: January 20, 2011 Decided: February 8, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adam Wade Owens, Appellant Pro Se. John Albert Maxfield, COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF WAKE, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Adam Wade Owens appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Owens v. Harrison, No. 5:08-ct-03100-FL (E.D.N.C.
July 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.