The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7009•United States of America v. Timnah K. Rudisill
10-7009Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 12, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TIMNAH K. RUDISILL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:01-cr-00048-MR-9)
Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 12, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timnah K. Rudisill, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Amy
Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jill
Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Timnah K. Rudisill appeals the district court’s order
denying his “Emergency Motion for Dismissal and/or Immediate
Release Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a
Claim.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Rudisill, No. 1:01-cr-00048-
MR-9 (W.D.N.C. June 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.