The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6904•Timothy Charley v. Office of the Attorney General
10-6904Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 9, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6904
TIMOTHY CHARLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney
General; MARY S. WILLIAMS, Assistant Attorney General,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (6:10-cv-01204-CMC)
Submitted: November 17, 2010 Decided: December 9, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Charley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Charley appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Charley v. Office of the Att’y Gen., No. 6:10-cv-01204-CMC
(D.S.C. June 21, 2010). We deny Charley’s motion for discovery
and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.