United States of America v. Vernon Corneilus Bryant, Jr.

10-6867Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 22, 2010

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6867
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
VERNON CORNEILUS BRYANT, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (4:04-cr-00075-D-3)
Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 22, 2010
Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vernon Corneilus Bryant, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack
Higdon, Jr., Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States
Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Vernon Corneilus Bryant, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment of the district court. See United States v. Bryant,
No. 4:04-cr-00075-D-3 (E.D.N.C. June 17, 2010); United States v.
Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 321
(2009) (noting that defendant convicted of a crack offense, but
sentenced pursuant to a mandatory statutory minimum sentence, is
ineligible for a reduction under § 3582(c)(2)). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.