The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6838•United States of America v. Mohammad Ashray Mohammad-Omar
10-6838Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 7, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6838
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MOHAMMAD ASHRAY MOHAMMAD-OMAR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:07-cr-00425-CMH-3)
Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 7, 2010
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mohammad Ashray Mohammad-Omar, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Donald
Mellin, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mohammad Ashray Mohammad-Omar appeals the district
court’s order denying his request for production of transcripts.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Mohammad-Omar, No. 1:07-cr-00425-CMH-3
(E.D. Va. May 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.