The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6783•United States of America v. Jay Emmitt Baker
10-6783Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 14, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6783
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAY EMMITT BAKER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:07-cr-00642-TLW-1)
Submitted: January 27, 2011 Decided: February 14, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jay Emmitt Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker
Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jay Emmitt Baker appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider the court’s order denying his
motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b)
motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Baker,
No. 4:07-cr-00642-TLW-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 16, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.