The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6761•United States of America v. Larry Arnold Young
10-6761Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 8, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6761
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:88-cr-00112-1)
Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 8, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Arnold Young, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Arnold Young appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on
appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Young, No. 1:88-cr-00112-1 (S.D. W. Va.
May 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.