The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6711•United States of America v. Anthony Dewayne Mcclelland, a/k/a Ant
10-6711Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 3, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6711
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY DEWAYNE MCCLELLAND, a/k/a Ant,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:05-cr-00009-RLV-DCK-13)
Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 3, 2010
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Dewayne McClelland, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Dewayne McClelland appeals the district
court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
McClelland, No. 5:05-cr-00009-RLV-DCK-13 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 29,
2010). We deny McClelland’s motion to appoint counsel and
motion to produce 21 U.S.C. § 851 (2006) notice. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.