The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6706•Donald James Hurlbert v. City of North Charleston; Glen Kramer
10-6706Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 9, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6706
DONALD JAMES HURLBERT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON; GLEN KRAMER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (9:09-cv-01084-HMH)
Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 9, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald James Hurlbert, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Pendarvis
McDonald, Sandra Jane Senn, SENN, MCDONALD & LEINBACK, LLC,
Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald James Hurlbert appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hurlbert v. City of North Charleston, No. 9:09-cv-01084-
HMH (D.S.C. Apr. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.