The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6695•Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr. v. Sarah Revell; Eric Holder
10-6695Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 7, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6695
CHARLES ROBERT BAREFOOT, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
SARAH REVELL; ERIC HOLDER,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:09-hc-02091-D)
Submitted: September 16, 2010 Decided: October 7, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., a federal pre-trial
detainee, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on
his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition and the
order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Barefoot v.
Revell, No. 5:09-hc-02091-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 18, 2010; Apr. 5,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.