The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6669•United States of America v. John Eric Hughes
10-6669Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 27, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6669
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOHN ERIC HUGHES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:00-cr-00004-JRS-2)
Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 27, 2010
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Eric Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Cornell Wallace,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Eric Hughes appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of an order denying
Hughes’ motion to correct his presentence report. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Hughes, No. 3:00-cr-00004-JRS-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 31,
2009). We deny Hughes’ motion to supplement the appellate brief
and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.