The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6656•United States of America v. JOHN EDWARD BELL, JR., a/k/a Goochie
10-6656Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 16, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6656
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JOHN EDWARD BELL, JR., a/k/a Goochie,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:02-cr-00049-DKC-1)
Submitted: February 22, 2011 Decided: March 16, 2011
Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Edward Bell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne
Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Edward Bell, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Bell, No. 8:02-cr-00049-DKC-1 (D. Md. Mar. 29, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.