The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6654•United States of America v. Eric Bernard Smith, a/k/a E, a/k/a Pac-Man
10-6654Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 3, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6654
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ERIC BERNARD SMITH, a/k/a E, a/k/a Pac-Man,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:03-cr-00012-RLV-2)
Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: August 3, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Bernard Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eric Bernard Smith appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See
Dillon v. United States, __ S. Ct. __, No. 09-6338, 2010 WL
2400109, at *5 (June 17, 2010); United States v. Dunphy, 551
F.3d 247, 251-53 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 2401
(2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.