The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6647•United States of America v. Jessie Scott, a/k/a Jay Scott
10-6647Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 3, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6647
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JESSIE SCOTT, a/k/a Jay Scott,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, Senior
District Judge. (1:04-cr-00453-TSE-1)
Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 3, 2010
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jessie Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, James
L. Trump, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jessie Scott appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion for
reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See United States v. Scott, No. 1:04-cr-00453-TSE-1
(E.D. Va. filed Apr. 19, 2010 & entered Apr. 20, 2010). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.