The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6641•United States of America v. Sidney Derrod Evans, a/k/a Dooley
10-6641Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 9, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6641
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SIDNEY DERROD EVANS, a/k/a Dooley,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:02-cr-00225-JBF-2)
Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 9, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sidney Derrod Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sidney Derrod Evans appeals the district court’s order
granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Evans, No. 2:02-cr-
00225-JBF-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 26, 2010 & entered Mar. 29,
2010); see also Dillon v. United States, __ U.S. __, 2010 WL
2400109 (U.S. June 17, 2010) (No. 09-6338) (holding that United
States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), does not apply to
§ 3582(c)(2) proceedings). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.