The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6629•United States of America v. Chenomusa N-Jie
10-6629Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 8, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6629
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHENOMUSA N-JIE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:05-cr-00064-FPS-JES-2)
Submitted: November 10, 2010 Decided: December 8, 2010
Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chenomusa N-Jie, Appellant Pro Se. Randolph John Bernard,
Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Chenomusa N-Jie appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
his Motion for Extension of Time to file a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
(West Supp. 2010) motion. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. N-Jie, No. 5:05-
cr-00064-FPS-JES-2 (N.D. W. Va. Apr. 13, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.