The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6610•United States of America v. Willie Barrett
10-6610Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 28, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6610
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILLIE BARRETT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (4:04-cr-00087-H-3)
Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 28, 2010
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Barrett, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Willie Barrett appeals the district court’s order
granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v.
Barrett, No. 4:04-cr-00087-H-3 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2010); see
United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009). We deny
Barrett’s motion to appoint counsel and his motion for
production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.