The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6595•Reginald C. Sweat v. DORRIS COOK, Head Nurse, Individual
10-6595Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 30, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6595
REGINALD C. SWEAT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DORRIS COOK, Head Nurse, Individual and Official Capacity;
HARRY MCKENN, Dr., Individual and Official Capacity,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(9:09-cv-01255-HFF)
Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: November 30, 2010
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald C. Sweat, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr.,
Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Reginald C. Sweat appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Sweat v. Cook,
No. 9:09-cv-01255-HFF (D.S.C. Apr. 9, 2010). We deny Sweat’s
motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.