The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6524•Earl Boyd Trump v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF; COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY, Montgomery County
10-6524Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 2, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6524
EARL BOYD TRUMP,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF; COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY, Montgomery
County,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:10-cv-00142-GEC-MFU)
Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 2, 2010
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl Boyd Trump, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Earl Boyd Trump appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Trump v. Montgomery
Cnty. Sheriff, No. 7:10-cv-00142-GEC-MFU (W.D. Va. Mar. 31,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.