Emmanuel Edward Sewell v. JOHN A. ROWLEY, Warden

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6463
EMMANUEL EDWARD SEWELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JOHN A. ROWLEY, Warden; IAMES, Correctional Officer; RALEY,
Correctional Officer; MCKENZIE, Correctional Officer;
SHOEMAKER, Correctional Officer; ADAMS, Correctional
Officer; WALKER, Correctional Officer; HOUSE, Correctional
Officer; WERNER, Sergeant; WHITEMAN, Sergeant; SPEIR,
Sergeant; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:09-cv-00693-DKC)
Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 17, 2011
Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emmanuel Edward Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip M. Pickus,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
Philip Melton Andrews, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Emmanuel Edward Sewell appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Sewell v. Rowley, No. 8:09-cv-00693-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 18,
2010). We further deny Sewell’s motion for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --