Orlando Rapheal Clark v. Officer Harrison

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6447
ORLANDO RAPHEAL CLARK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER HARRISON,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
BOYD BENNETT; LAWRENCE SOLOMON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:08-ct-03114-D)
Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Orlando Rapheal Clark, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Orlando Rapheal Clark appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Clark v. Harrison, No. 5:08-ct-03114-D (E.D.N.C. Mar.
12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --