The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6416•Michael Brunell Flanigan v. Elizabeth Panaguiten, Mlp
10-6416Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 17, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6416
MICHAEL BRUNELL FLANIGAN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ELIZABETH PANAGUITEN, MLP; J. D. ALLEN, Clinical Director;
VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden; HARRELL WATTS, Administrator
National Inmate Appeals; KIM WHITE, Southeast Regional
Director; Y. APONTE, Assistant Health Services
Administrator; S. DESROCHERS,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, General Accounting Office; FEDERAL
BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:08-cv-00169-MSD-TEM)
Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 17, 2011
Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Michael Brunell Flanigan, Appellant Pro Se. George Maralan
Kelley, III, Assistant United States Attorney, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Michael Brunell Flanigan appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Flanigan’s
motion to supplement the record, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Flanigan v. Panaguiten, No. 2:08-
cv-00169-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 2, 2010 & entered Feb. 3,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.