The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6402•United States of America v. Troy Pelts, a/k/a James Lee Start
10-6402Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 3, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6402
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TROY PELTS, a/k/a James Lee Start,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. James A. Beaty,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (6:92-cr-00305-JAB-1)
Submitted: July 21, 2011 Decided: August 3, 2011
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Troy Pelts, Appellant Pro Se. L. Patrick Auld, Assistant United
States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Troy Pelts appeals the district court’s orders denying
his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for
reduction of sentence and denying his motion for an extension of
time to file an appeal. We have reviewed the record and Pelts’s
contentions regarding his § 3582(c)(2) motion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Pelts, No.
6:92-cr-00305-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. July 13, 2009). Because we have
reviewed Pelts’s challenge to the denial of a sentence reduction
on the merits, we find his appeal of the denial of the motion
for an extension to be moot. United States v. Pelts, No.
6:92-cr-00305-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2010). Finally, we
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.