United States of America v. Reginald Boone, a/k/a Reggie

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6380
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
REGINALD BOONE, a/k/a Reggie,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (2:92-cr-00113-002)
Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 1, 2010
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Boone appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
hold the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
the motion. See United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197, 200
(4th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order for the reasons stated there. See United States v. Boone,
No. 2:92-cr-00113-002 (E.D. Va. Feb. 18, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --