The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6345•United States of America v. Robert Edward Sills, a/k/a Bobby
10-6345Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 30, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBERT EDWARD SILLS, a/k/a Bobby,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:03-cr-00148-JBF-5)
Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 30, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Edward Sills, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Edward Sills appeals a district court order
denying his “Motion Petition the Court to Alter or Amend
Judgment Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 59(e).” We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See United States v. Sills, No.
2:03-cr-00148-JBF-5 (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.