The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6344•United States of America v. Vance Marcel Gibson, a/k/a Reginald Hilton Belton
10-6344Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 8, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6344
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
VANCE MARCEL GIBSON, a/k/a Reginald Hilton Belton,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. James A. Beaty,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (6:93-cr-00211-WLO-1)
Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 8, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vance Marcel Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston,
Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Vance Marcel Gibson appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
orders for the reasons stated there. See United States v.
Gibson, No. 6:93-cr-00211-WLO-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 22 & May 11,
2010). Further, we deny Gibson’s motion for the appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.