The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6309•United States of America v. Charles Emanuel Rash, a/k/a Chaz, a/k/a Charlie
10-6309Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 3, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6309
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHARLES EMANUEL RASH, a/k/a Chaz, a/k/a Charlie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (3:01-cr-00025-JPB-DJJ-1)
Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 3, 2010
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Emanuel Rash, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow,
Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Emanuel Rash appeals the district court’s
orders denying his “Motion for Judicial Recommendation Regarding
Designation for Service of Federal Sentence” and subsequent
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rash,
No. 3:01-cr-00025-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 28 & Feb. 16,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.