Michael Richard D’alessandro v. Montgomery County, Maryland

10-6296Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 28, 2010

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6296
MICHAEL RICHARD D’ALESSANDRO,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; SUZYK MALAGARY; JOHN DOE, Case
Manager; GRANT CLARK, Property Manager,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:09-cv-00190-PJM)
Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 28, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Richard D’Alessandro, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia
Lisehora Kane, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Richard D’Alessandro appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. D’Alessandro v. Montgomery County, No. 8:09-cv-
00190-PJM (D. Md. filed Jan. 20, 2009; entered Jan. 21, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.