The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6272•United States of America v. Bruce Lee Johnson
10-6272Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 28, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6272
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BRUCE LEE JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District
Judge. (4:02-cr-00579-CWH-2)
Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 28, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce Lee Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. William E. Day, II, Rose
Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bruce Lee Johnson appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) to set aside
his conviction on the ground that the criminal judgment against
him is void. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Johnson, No.
4:02-cr-00579-CWH-2 (D.S.C. Feb. 1, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.