The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6267•Charles Anthony Austin v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; M. MITCHELL, in an official capacity
10-6267Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 9, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6267
CHARLES ANTHONY AUSTIN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; M. MITCHELL, in an official
capacity,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District
Judge. (6:09-cv-00485-MBS)
Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 9, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Anthony Austin, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Anthony Austin, a federal prisoner, appeals
the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Austin v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons,
No. 6:09-cv-00485-MBS (D.S.C. Jan. 27, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.