United States of America v. Tyrone Noble

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6125
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TYRONE NOBLE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:06-cr-00748-JFA-9)
Submitted: October 26, 2010 Decided: November 23, 2010
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Noble, Appellant Pro Se. Julius Ness Richardson,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Noble appeals from the district court’s orders
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of
sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and the arguments of the parties, and we affirm the
denial of Noble’s § 3582 motion for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Noble, No. 3:06-cr-00748-JFA-9
(D.S.C. Dec. 2, 2009). Regarding Noble’s motion for
reconsideration, although we affirm the district court’s denial
of the motion, we conclude that the district court had no
jurisdiction to consider Noble’s motion. See United States v.
Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct.
3530 (2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --