United States of America v. Marty Lorenzo Wright

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6085
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARTY LORENZO WRIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (4:95-cr-00039-TEM-TEM-1)
Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 9, 2010
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marty Lorenzo Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Scott W. Putney,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Marty Lorenzo Wright appeals the district court’s
order entered on December 10, 2009, denying his “Letter/Motion
In The Interest of Justice.” In Wright’s “Letter/Motion” he
appears to seek reconsideration of the court’s July 15, 2009
order, which granted him a reduction of his sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). See United States v. Wright, No.
4:95-cr-00039-TEM-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. July 15, 2009). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district
court’s denial of Wright’s motion to reconsider. Accordingly,
we affirm. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234-46
(4th Cir. 2010) (holding that district court lacked authority to
grant defendant’s motion to reconsider, filed eight months after
the district court’s order ruling on original § 3582(c)(2)
motion). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --