The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6054•Terence Terell Bryan v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
10-6054Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 28, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6054
TERENCE TERELL BRYAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; FNU BIRD,
Lieutenant; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WILLIAMS; CAPTAIN PRICE;
OFFICER OUTLAW; TRANSPORTATION SERGEANT; GREY HOUSE,
Officer; OFFICER PHILLIPS; FIRST NAME UNKNOWN, Lieutenant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:06-cv-03358-TLW)
Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 28, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terence Terell Bryan, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Franklin
Turner, Jr., TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Greenville,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Terence Terell Bryan appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Bryan v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No.
4:06-cv-03358-TLW (D.S.C. Dec. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.