The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6047•United States of America v. Corey Michael Leftwich
10-6047Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 6, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6047
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
COREY MICHAEL LEFTWICH,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (4:00-cr-00037-H-1)
Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 6, 2010
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Corey Michael Leftwich, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Jude Darrow,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Corey Michael Leftwich seeks to appeal the district
court’s order construing his motion for an evidentiary hearing
as a successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion and
dismissing it on that basis. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Leftwich, No. 4:00-cr-00037-H-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 16, 2009;
entered Dec. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.