The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-6036•United States of America v. Willie Jerome McRae
10-6036Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 5, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6036
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILLIE JEROME MCRAE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:98-cr-00037-F-13)
Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 5, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Jerome McRae, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Willie Jerome McRae appeals the district court’s order
denying his petition for a writ of audita querela. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm. See United States v. Torres, 282 F.3d 1241, 1245
(10th Cir. 2002) (“[A] writ of audita querela is not available
to a petitioner when other remedies exist, such as a motion to
vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.”) (internal quotation
marks omitted). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.