The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-2429•Bruce E. Smith v. RAY MABUS, Secretary Dept. of the Navy Agency
10-2429Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 10, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2429
BRUCE E. SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RAY MABUS, Secretary Dept. of the Navy Agency,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:10-cv-00502-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: April 27, 2011 Decided: May 10, 2011
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce E. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bruce E. Smith appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint for nonpayment of filing fees. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Mabus,
No. 2:10-cv-00502-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 19; entered
Oct. 20, 2010 & Nov. 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.