The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-2361•Jonathan Bolls v. W. SCOTT STREET, III, Secretary of the Virginia Board of Examiners
10-2361Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 17, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2361
JONATHAN BOLLS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
W. SCOTT STREET, III, Secretary of the Virginia Board of
Examiners,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00550-REP)
Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 17, 2011
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan Bolls, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Crooks Hill,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Bolls appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing Bolls’ complaint for lack of jurisdiction and denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Bolls v. Street, No. 3:10-cv-00550-REP
(E.D. Va. Nov. 5 & Dec. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.